Why has the pro-life movement been
unsuccessful in overturning Roe v Wade? Because contraception continues to be
approved, accepted, and available in our society. That’s not exactly a popular
opinion, but a comment by Michael Voris in a talk given at the end of June to a
group in New York rings true. Voris challenged, “Just walk into any pro-life
meeting and say we’re not going to get rid of abortion until we get rid of
contraception and see what happens.” Many who decry abortion still defend
contraception.
Currently, of course,
contraception has been in the limelight as our bishops fight the HHS
contraception mandate. They have been very vocal in stating that contraception
runs counter to Church teaching, and Catholic employers and institutions should
not be required to violate their consciences by providing it for their
employees. Unfortunately, as Michael Voris notes in a “special report” Vortex,
it seems that the USCCB’s right hand doesn’t know what the left is doing.
Voris hit the nail on the head
again: his “Special Report” Vortex episode (Saturday, July 21) is below, along
with the script, but here’s the gist of the most recent gaff as Michael Voris
explains it (my emphases throughout):
It was recently
reported by the wonderful folks at Life Site News that the United States Conference
of Catholic Bishops “official overseas relief and development agency”, Catholic
Relief Services, recently doled out over 5 million dollars to CARE – an international
“relief and development organization” which actively promotes contraception
around the world.
Let’s boil it down: The US
bishops are suing over the Obamacare mandate in the United States because it forces health insurance payments for
contraception. Yet…OUTSIDE the United States they are handing money to
international organizations that promote
and advance contraception – the very thing they are fighting AGAINST on the
other side of the Atlantic.
According
to the LifeSiteNews article,
CARE’s support of contraception is explicit, and CARE clearly expresses its
hostility to anti-abortion legislation. A
2009 article on the CARE website is a request to then newly-elected
President Obama to rescind the Mexico City Policy; it concludes:
According to the UNFPA, about
90 percent of global abortion-related deaths and disabilities could be avoided
if women who wanted effective contraception were given access. Is this not a win-win situation?
“Win-win?”
Yes – for organizations like Planned Parenthood, who provide contraception
knowing that the failure rate will ensure an abortion rate that will fill their
coffers. But the CRS doesn’t seem to see it that way. TheThe LifeSiteNews article
notes the comments of a CRS official:
When asked if, given the
evidence on CARE, CRS would end its partnership with the organization, CRS
Communications Director John Rivera said “no.” He indicated that concerns had already been raised and
dismissed.
Rivera told LifeSiteNews that
CRS doesn’t so much give the money to the organization as act as a
“pass-through” for federal funding to such groups, and that the money is given only to projects in line
with Catholic teaching.
However, when asked if CRS
would similarly issue ‘pass-through’ funding to Planned Parenthood for a
morally neutral project, Rivera replied in the negative. “We would never partner with Planned
Parenthood,” he said.
He explained the difference
saying, it’s about “the preponderance of
work they do.” Rivera noted that CRS acts on criteria developed by the U.S.
bishops. “We’ve given this a lot of consideration, and there’s a threshold in terms of what the focus of an agency is, and
the preponderance of their work.”
LSN
quotes noted theologian Dr. William Marshner, the founding professor of
theology at Christendom College, who takes exception to this line of reasoning:
“Well this is like saying that
we will fund an organization that does 50 or fewer assassinations a year, but
not one that will commit 50 or more assassinations a year. The idea of such a threshold is preposterous. The only defense
would be if a group to whom they had given money incidentally, or rarely, or
accidentally, or inadvertently did something immoral with it. But, if the group
to whom the money is given has a regular
practice of using some of their funds in this way, then it is immoral for a Church organization
to give money to that outfit.”
Or, as
Michael Voris notes a bit more succinctly in the Vortex episode below: “And Mussolini got the trains to run on time,
and Hitler built good roads. C’mon!”
Through
this kind of inconsistency – and incompetency – the bishops stand to lose
ground in the legal battle against the HHS mandate. They can’t make the case
that contraception is a moral evil against Church teaching in the US, all the
while cheerfully handing out millions of dollars for the spread of
contraceptives in other parts of the world.
But
then, isn’t that the kind of inconsistency that’s met the issue ever since Humanae Vitae reaffirmed the evil of contraception?
Bishops themselves opposed the teaching, priest counseled (and continue to
counsel) couples to “follow their conscience” regarding it, and it became a
topic never to be discussed from the pulpit. We’re paying the price now.
Actually,
we’ve been paying the price for years. It’s just that only recently have we
begun to realize that the problem exists. And while the bishops are surely
following the right path in fighting the HHS mandate, they are still missing
the boat in terms of teaching what the Church has maintained for 2000 years:
contraception is a grave moral evil.
Here’s
the Vortex (for other Vortex posts, click on the tab at the top of the page):
Some
kind of institutional schizophrenia has apparently seized hold at the American
Bishops headquarters in Washington DC – and its being recognized over here in
Rome.
It was
recently reported by the wonderful folks at Life Site News that the United
States
Conference
of Catholic Bishops “official overseas relief and development agency”, Catholic
Relief Services, recently doled out over 5 million dollars to CARE – an international
“relief and development organization” which actively promotes contraception
around the world.
Let’s
boil it down: The US bishops are suing over the Obamacare mandate in the United
States because it forces health insurance payments for contraception. Yet…OUTSIDE
the United States they are handing money to international organizations that
promote and advance contraception – the very thing they are fighting AGAINST on
the other side of the Atlantic.
What in
the heck is going on at USCCB headquarters? When Our Blessed Lord said, “Do not
let your right hand know what your left hand is doing”, it’s pretty certain
THIS is not what He was talking about.
For
years – decades actually – many people have been questioning the whole purpose
of the USCCB: its reason for being. For many on the outside, it’s this massive
140-million-dollar-a year-bureaucracy that is completely mysterious in its
inner workings.
Apparently,
it’s mysterious for the people who work on the inside as well. Listen to the
excuse…or reason…that the Communications Director of the CRS gave for handing
5.3 million dollars to a pro-contraception international organization.
John
Rivera said CRS doesn’t so much give the money to the organization as act as a
“pass-through” for federal funding to such groups, and that the money is given
only to projects in line with Catholic teaching.
Oh. So,
unlike the Catholic Campaign for Human Development Office at USCCB headquarters
– which gives Catholic collection plate money DIRECTLY to pro-gay,
pro-abortion, pro-homosexual groups and has been for years – this is different
because CRS is just funneling your government tax dollars to the group.
GOT IT!!!
Just
for the record…how is that ONE BIT DIFFERENT than what Obama is doing already –
sending Hilary Clinton around the globe with sacks of cash for governments that
will promote contraception? Seriously.
When
asked further why it was okay to give money to CARE, Rivera basically responded
that CARE does all kinds of work – not JUST promote contraception. Uh…what!?! Yeah. And Mussolini got the
trains to run on time, and Hitler built good roads. C’mon!
This
whole embarrassing and scandalous episode – which folks in Rome have become
aware of – is just one more example of how the Church in America has totally
sub-contracted the business of the corporal works of mercy to the US
government.
It’s
also demonstrative of the institutional madness that keeps occurring at the
Bishop
Headquarters
when the lay mostly-liberal staffers are running the show. Exactly who is Communications
Director John Rivera speaking for when he says this practice is perfectly acceptable
and moral?
The
national conference seems to be unhinged. Take, for example, Obamacare. During
the debate in Congress, the Bishops conference was voicing full-throated
support for national health insurance. Then all of a sudden, when the truth about
abortion funding came out, they slammed on the brakes.
Didn’t
anyone at the conference READ the legislation before telling the bishops to
back it? Obviously they were too busy looking for the next liberal cause to
fund.
Then,
when Obama came out with his HHS mandate, again: total shock and awe at USCCB Headquarters.
Again: is no one reading this stuff and strategizing BEFORE the disaster hits?
But we
see this in microcosm in many different diocese round the States. Who could
forget the debacle that was gay marriage in New York? Cardinal Dolan said in a
TV interview AFTER the fact that the bishops of New York were caught totally
off guard by the passage of gay marriage – led by Catholic governor Andrew
Cuomo and finally championed by the votes of two Knights of Columbus state
assemblymen.
He said
they had been misled, or relied on bad advice from their counselors who said
gay marriage didn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of passing. Really? When
every public poll showed support for it, and the governor had campaigned
ferociously on this very point? Not the slimmest chance of passing? Not even
enough to fake mustering some kind of assault?
At
every turn, practically every week, USCCB liberals are publishing statements
about the economy, immigration, social justice…blah blah blah. At the same time,
some other office down the hall is handing money out the door to
pro-contraception groups.
Just
who runs the USCCB? Who makes the decisions? Who sets policy? More importantly
– who enforces policy? Who follows up? Does anyone on staff have to take an
oath of loyalty or fidelity to the Faith? Does anyone care?
In the
bishops’ lawsuits against Obamacare and the HHS mandate promoting contraception,
it would be interesting to see how much money is being paid to Church lawyers
for their services, and then compare that number to the 5 million the CRS is
paying out to pro-contraception agencies.
Perhaps
this is a good time to scrub the whole thing…re-think exactly what the mission
of the organization should be, and start over…if that.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be courteous and concise.