Perhaps a silver lining in that dark cloud of the HSS
mandate is the possibility that priests are starting to feel emboldened and
encouraged to speak the truth with regard to artificial contraception (and,
hopefully, other issues)!
Here is one of the most uplifting and encouraging Face Book
status posts I’ve seen in a long time (my emphases):
Seriously the best homily
today. Fr. Vietor preached on the
sinfulness of contraception, in a straightforward yet loving way. No minced
words. And challenged those women who use it to throw away their pills today, or get rid of their contraceptive
devices. And he told the men: "Stop
using your wives." It was powerful! He also analyzed this culture of
instant gratification, and how far reaching the damage is, infecting every part
of our lives and our nation. It was incredible!
This was from Leila Habra Miller of Little Catholic Bubble; she lives in a diocese which also has a fine upstanding bishop: Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted of the Diocese
of Phoenix.
I think I’ve mentioned before that in ten years as a
Catholic, I have never once heard the sinfulness of contraception preached from
the pulpit, nor taught in any meaningful way in the parish. It was pretty clear
to me from early on that this was the elephant in the living room of Catholic “polite”
community.
I wrote a letter to the editor of our local newspaper (see
that story here), and I tried to hammer home the fact that contraception is
immoral. A friend emailed me after reading the letter and told me
I felt it pushed the
contraceptive agenda etc. of the Church too much and didn't address the issue
of governmental interference in our religious liberties enough…We will not
stop OCare by spreading our doctrine, it is a turn-off to most people, we are
not out to make converts but we ARE trying to make sure our U.S. Constitution
is protected…But if we jam the front with everything we believe and the same
old rhetoric we will turn off the non-Catholics…
I think she’s wrong. It's more of an issue to mess with
God's plan for procreation than it is to violate religious liberties. The
bishops should be mentioning first and foremost that contraception is a grave
sin, an affront to God, and therefore intolerable (just like abortion and
euthanasia and assisted suicide), and that therefore
it is an affront to religious liberty to force the Church to comply with
the HSS mandate.
For an excellent commentary along these lines, read Louie Verrecchio’s
article “Just
Imagine”, in which he compares the bishops’ reaction to the contraception
mandate to what we might imagine would be their reaction to a similar mandate
for “end of life services” like assisted suicide and euthanasia. He points out
that in the latter case, the bishops would likely focus on the immorality of
the acts, not the religious freedom to resist them. He writes:
I mean, after all, these acts
are intrinsically evil no matter who does them; in other words, they're
an offense against Almighty God and a violation of Divine Law in all cases, and
so any bishop worth his salt would be certain to make this the
centerpiece of his message, wouldn't he?
That’s not been the case with the HSS mandate, but it should
be. That’s got to change. Verrecchio continues:
The disordered episcopal
priorities that are so plainly evident in the current HHS mandate debacle are
nothing new. In fact, they’re so old that one can reasonably assume that the
majority of Catholics in the United States today consider free sterilization
and contraception less as an affront against God than as a welcome gift.
It is in this climate that the American bishops are now trying to rally the troops by asking the very same people they failed to form in the faith to join them in battling the gift horse. That should go well.
I hope I’m wrong, but I’m pretty sure that most of the 54% of self-identified “Catholics” who voted for Obama won’t be beating down the door to fall in line, and given the contracepting tendencies of the other 46% I wouldn’t bet the farm on the majority of them either.
It is in this climate that the American bishops are now trying to rally the troops by asking the very same people they failed to form in the faith to join them in battling the gift horse. That should go well.
I hope I’m wrong, but I’m pretty sure that most of the 54% of self-identified “Catholics” who voted for Obama won’t be beating down the door to fall in line, and given the contracepting tendencies of the other 46% I wouldn’t bet the farm on the majority of them either.
Read the whole article here.
And maybe things are changing! Hope springs eternal! Leila
Miller’s pastor is a case in point: if he can do it, others will, too! And besides that, it is my contention that there are plenty of people out there who want to hear the Truth. They crave it.
The particular priest preached against the evil of
homosexual “marriage”. He did so by telling the people what the Church teaches
from Scripture and from the Catechism.
And he was surprised that his remarks were met with…wait for it…
…no, not catcalls and boo-ing…
…but applause and
a standing ovation.
Now, I am not a fan of applause at Mass, and this priest was
also uncomfortable with it. But I think that every now and then, such spontaneous applause
does happen and is a result of the
people’s hearts – and consciences – being touched by the preaching of the
Truth.
They are hungry for the Truth.
I am hungry for the Truth.
Are you?
Tell your priest.