Just
wondering, when worshipping in a corporate setting, where is the line between
letting go and worshipping freely, and self-indulgence that causes distraction
and becomes a stumbling block?
Ah yes. I was a Pentecostal
Christian for a number of years. The music was important. The music was "uplifting", I thought. As I was being drawn to the Catholic Church, I still held out for
the music – with electric guitars, drums, keyboard – of the Pentecostal church
I attended. The music at the Catholic church – with acoustic guitars, drums,
and piano – sucked. I said I’d go to Mass to receive Jesus, but I’d still go to
the Pentecostal church for the music…but only as long as I was enjoying the
music, of course.
At some point, I came to wonder
if we were worshiping the music instead of the Lord.
And that, my friends, is why
liturgical worship is so liberating.
Well…let me qualify that: I’m
talking about liturgical worship that follows the rubrics, and liturgical music
that follows the mind of the Church rather than the mind of the choir director
or the liturgy committee or the “worship team”.
“Letting go and worshipping
freely” in the sense my Face Book friend is using that phrase, is, I believe, something
you do in the privacy of your own room. Public worship – liturgy – is not the
place for individualized expressions of praise. Neither is it the place for debates
within the "music ministry" about which hymns or songs to sing.
The liturgy mandated by the
Church takes away the petty arguments about style and particular songs. Gregorian
chant has pride of place; the proper chants of the Mass are determined from
ages ago and have evolved out of the wisdom of the Church. The liturgy becomes
what it is meant to be – a public expression of worship – by unifying all of
the faithful as they use the same words and worship in a universal way.
So where’s the freedom, then?
Well, the freedom is in following the mind of the Church. Non-Catholic
Christians can generally agree that following Jesus is liberating – there is
absolute freedom in following Truth. Non-Christians will argue that
Christianity puts all kinds of constraints on human behavior, so we are not “free”.
They don’t understand that we are bound by sin when we follow our own fallen,
sinful nature.
In the same way, our fallen
human nature makes itself known in the “freedom” of style of worship in
non-Catholic Christian services. My Face Book friend mentions the fine line
between “letting go and worshipping freely” and “self-indulgence that causes
distraction”. Been there, done that! When there are no rules, human
concupiscence can run wild, and individuals can justify their behavior on the
grounds that “the Spirit led me” – even, and maybe especially, in the context
of the very worship of God. We
end up having music for its entertainment value, and when we do that, we have
debates, because not everyone is “entertained” in the same way by particular
types of music.
The Mass, though – especially the
“old” Mass, the “traditional Latin Mass”, the “extraordinary form” of the Mass –
allows for “actual” participation of
the faithful. That participation is internal, in the depths of one’s soul,
rather than the external manifestation of singing, dancing, waving of hands,
falling to the floor, etc. The priest leads us in prayer to God, and we are
united behind him. The music – Gregorian chant in particular – carries our
minds upward to God, rather than centering our thoughts on ourselves. Truly
liturgical, sacred music does not mimic the popular music of the time. It must
itself be timeless, objectively beautiful, and “traditional” rather than “contemporary”.
Contemporary quickly becomes trite.
This video from Corpus Christi
Watershed, created a few years ago, is an excellent explanation of the difference between sacred
liturgical music and “contemporary” music that is inappropriate for Mass. Even if you've seen it before, it's a good review.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please be courteous and concise.