I’m
trying to tie together a few Vortex episodes along with a Disney propaganda film
from the ‘60’s to make a point here about the value of the family, and the
desirability of letting God choose family size.
The
August 5 Vortex episode was entitled “Obama- The Great Destroyer of Families”. I’d like to make a few comments on it. See the
script here.
In this
episode, after acknowledging that Obama “holds nothing sacred except that which
is evil”, Michael Voris goes on to say (all emphases mine):
But perhaps the most dangerous
thing he has done – IS doing – is the total economic restructuring of the once most powerful economy in the
history of the world. Not because money matters more than life or sexual
morality, but because when you force, bend, twist, and mutilate economic
realities, they have a “back up the chain” reaction with families, and [with] people’s
abilities to have and provide for their families.
…Economies follow human life cycles, not the other way around. Ah,
but in Obama’s case, he is attempting, with a large measure of success, to affect the human life cycle by screwing up
the economy.
Consider his lie about taxes.
On the campaign trail – each election – he said no one earning under $250,000
will pay any more in taxes. Then on January 1st of this year, the average full
time American worker saw $40 more dollars yanked out his check than the year
before; and last time I checked, the average American worker was not making
above $250,000.
After providing
some statistics, Voris summarizes by saying:
So what is the trend here – a
smaller percentage of people working over all, and of those who are working,
less and less full time jobs available. Something is rotten in the economy. And
when you factor is that even many of the full time jobs that people secured
were steps down from their previous jobs in terms of pay, hours and benefits –
you can begin to see how the way is being paved for a total transformation of the economy.
Less and less people able to
work the jobs they want and NEED. How come you never hear THIS story from the
social justice squawkers in Catholic circles. Isn’t the dignity of man as
worker a foundational concept in the Church?
… The Church upholds the family
– the traditional family. Yet many of the heads of these households aren’t able
to find either work or the necessary work to sustain their families. And as
most people know, financial stressors are the leading cause of fights and arguments
and lack of peace in the home. If you back Obama and call yourself a Catholic –
consider what your vote for him has done to harm, hurt, and break apart the
traditional family. The man supports evil – not only in the obvious forms of
sodomy and child murder and contraception, but also – at the same time – by
using his power over the economy to cripple
families.
The destruction of family life
was the very first goal of both the
communists and the Nazis when they each came to power. If the state can get
control over the family – it’s lights out.
Now
consider this video – a propaganda piece created by Disney in the 1960’s at the
height of the “population bomb” scare. LifeSiteNews
ran it on August 2. I do not have a script for this video, but it is worth
watching in its entirety to get the full effect.
A few
points worth noting in the video is the message that families with few children
means a “better” life for everyone – for the children, the parents, for the
world! Having more children, the film tells us, means that the population is “out
of balance”; there are too many people and not enough resources. The families
with more children won’t have enough to eat, the family ox will starve and not
be able to pull the plow, and mom will be ever so much more tired and cranky
because she has to work so hard. (Eyes rolling.) And it is everyone's duty to do their part so that the world won't be overpopulated, and we will all live a life worth living. Blech. (If you believe any of that, please visit the Population Research Institute's educational video page and watch some of their videos.)
From “LesFemmes” blog:
And then consider the inherent
racism of this video which was made during Paul Ehrlich population bomb
hysteria period. A bunch of white elitists make a film showing a Hispanic
couple labeled as "everyman." Then consider that most Hispanic
countries are majority Catholic countries. This film was shot across the bow to
the Catholic Church which encourages generosity in life giving. The battle has
always been between the culture of death and the Lord of Life and His Church.
To me,
the callous dismissal of potential children is…unbelievable. But then, really,
many people have this attitude when they use birth control; they are not
thinking about the life that didn’t have a chance – only that they will have a
better life for themselves and their “existing” children if they limit the
number of souls who come into their families.
LifeSiteNews
also has made available an excellent paper, “The Inherent Racism of Population
Control”, which you can view here.
A LifeSiteNews
article also notes Robertson’s
comments that:
“That's the big problem,
especially in Appalachia. They don't know about birth control. They just keep
having babies.”
“You see a string of all these
little ragamuffins, and not enough food to eat and so on,” he said, “and it's
desperate poverty.”
“I'd say yes, birth control is absolutely an
important thing for people to use,” he added, saying contraception “is a very
important part of humanity.”
Michael
Voris responded:
Imagine calling children – Reverend
Pro-Life – calling children ragamuffins – those unwanted, can’t-be-afforded
children, disposable, should-never-have-been-born creations of Almighty God.
See, Mr. Robertson isn’t really
pro-LIFE. He’s pro-BIRTH! As is everyone in the prolife movement who wants
conceived children to be born, but allows for conception to be denied and
blocked and hampered. How can you call yourself pro-LIFE? You aren’t.
Robertson
also said that “birth control has always been permitted” by Protestant
ecclesial communities, but this is patently false; only since 1930 have any
Protestant groups condoned the practice. Michael Voris calls this
…the Protestant poison of birth
control that huge numbers of Catholics have unfortunately consumed as well. As
long as the pro-life movement is really nothing more than the pro-birth
movement – you can expect the killing [abortion] to continue.
Further
rebutting Robertson’s comments was the Vortex episode of August 8 entitled “Ragamuffin
Response” (go here
for the video and link to the script). Voris quotes from a comment left on
the CMTV Face Book page:
And her comment is especially
worth listening to – because she was one of those ragamuffin children. Her name
is Ruth:
“Well, as someone from
Appalachia and the tenth of 11 children whose parents' income was below the
poverty line, I have to say most people are clueless when they talk about this.
"Ragamuffins" indeed!
My parents had hoped for 12 children and the final child miscarried. Mom had
ten in her family and Dad had 12 in his. No one starved to death. No one
was cold or even hungry. The only ones who ever had trouble with that has been
the current generation and only those that have cut themselves off from their
Catholic faith and family.
While my family income was
poverty level, we were working poor with 12 hour days and with farming
abilities that we used well. Our work ethic was excellent. All 11 children in my
family are college graduates – most with advanced degrees. Poverty is not an issue about a
large number of children – we worked together for the good of the family.
True poverty is NOT about a
lack of money. It is about a lack of (example of) work ethic, a lack of
education (or lack of valuing education), a lack of family connections – broken
families (no one to catch you when you fall), a lack of charity (charity should
start with the family), a lack of the ability to work due to addictions (drugs
and alcohol.)
Children in a stable, loving
family are a way OUT of poverty for the whole family. I have seen it over and
over here. Families more easily fall into poverty when there are few children.”
Ruth’s
picture is a far cry from the depiction in the Disney propaganda film! And it
is a far cry from some NFP advocates who insist that births must sometimes
(often?) be limited so that the children “already born” can be cared for and
educated properly.
What
have the culture of death forces been doing over the last 50 years? They have
been promoting “family planning” in one form or another. At the end of the
Disney film, the woman asks whether “family planning” is “acceptable”, and
whether others are using it. I suspect this is a veiled reference to Catholic
Church teaching on artificial contraception. At any rate, she is assured by the
narrator that there’s a method that is right for everyone. Ha! This sounds
suspiciously like an ad for birth control that has appeared in our local newspaper:
Manipulation of the economy. Population
control. Family planning. Culture of Death.
Really,
our Church needs to do a better job of educating the faithful on these issues. And frankly, I do NOT think that means teaching NFP (surprise!).
Stay
tuned for Part II, hopefully tomorrow.
