EWTN, Belmont Abbey College, Christian University, and
Priests for Life are all taking Sebelius et al. to court! Yee hah! This is action! This is more than
writing a letter. This is more than having strong-sounding words read at Mass.
This is doing something about an egregious campaign against religious freedom and the Catholic Church. But…something seems to be missing…
It’s…our bishops! Why aren’t our bishops were leading this campaign?
Could it be that decades of receiving federal grants has compromised their position? Could it be that they are afraid of biting the hand that feeds them?
The creeping socialism that has become a roaring lion in this country is threatening not just our religious freedom, but the integrity of our religious leaders. We are soft. We've been lulled into complacency. We've stuck to the middle road so as not to ruffle feathers and to ensure that federal grants will continue to be awarded for our good works to be accomplished.
There's a price to pay.
This is doing something about an egregious campaign against religious freedom and the Catholic Church. But…something seems to be missing…
It’s…our bishops! Why aren’t our bishops were leading this campaign?
Could it be that decades of receiving federal grants has compromised their position? Could it be that they are afraid of biting the hand that feeds them?
The creeping socialism that has become a roaring lion in this country is threatening not just our religious freedom, but the integrity of our religious leaders. We are soft. We've been lulled into complacency. We've stuck to the middle road so as not to ruffle feathers and to ensure that federal grants will continue to be awarded for our good works to be accomplished.
There's a price to pay.
I remember way back in grad school when I was a liberal
non-Christian studying child psychology. At that time, much was being said and
written about the socialized day care and school programs in the Scandinavian
countries. I had a child, too, and state subsidized (read: free) child care
sounded pretty good on the face of it. But even I, naive as I was politically,
realized that when you invite the government to help you raise your children,
the government is going to insist on having something to say about how they are raised, what they are taught, and the number of
hours the kids will be in state care.
There's no free lunch.
There's no free lunch.
I found this 2002 statement on federal
funding in the USCCB archives:
The past several decades have
seen huge increases in federal awards to state and local governments and
non-profit organizations. Many of these federal awards are of a social service
nature and have been granted to church-related organizations interested in
meeting the needs of the underprivileged in this country (e.g., foster care grants to Catholic Charities). As the amounts
awarded to governmental units and non-profit organizations have increased, so
have the attempts to ensure that such funds are spent as intended and that such
funds are not subject to fraud, waste, and abuse. Additionally, the terms of federal awards are becoming
more restrictive with regard to the religious character that may be involved
with the use of those funds. Accordingly, care should be exercised to safeguard
the free exercise of our Catholic faith…
…
By accepting donations from
individuals or organizations that have attached restrictions to the donation,
an organization incurs a legal and moral
obligation to adhere to the restrictions imposed by the donor. The clear
alternative is not to accept the donation. Federal awards are no different in
this respect…
Certainly, our Catholic institutions – health, education,
and charity – are of value to society, and it is not altogether unreasonable to
expect that some tax moneys might go to the institutions that provide these
services. But, again, there is a price to pay for receiving federal funds.
Now we are beginning to see the price go up. And as the
price goes up, institutions fall. To wit: Catholic HealthCare West has voluntarily changed
its name and dropped its affiliation with the Catholic Church (see more about this here).
I think it’s time for
Catholics – bishops, priests, laity – to begin to grow up and take
responsibility for funding our own works. It’s time to get out of bed with the
government, to stop relying on government funds to do good works, and to put
our own Catholic money to work.
I hear the weeping and gnashing of teeth commencing: “We can’t
afford it!” “There’s not enough money!” “It’s impossible!” “People won’t give
that kind of money in this economic climate!”
Hogwash, I say. And I always have. There’s money. People will give…if they understand about
giving, about supporting the Church. And God will provide.
This means re-training the faithful, though. Come to think
of it, it means re-training the pastors as well.
Pastors of Pentecostal churches, in my experience, hammer on
tithing and on trusting God. In many Protestant churches, tithing – and they
mean ten per cent of one’s income – is unstintingly taught. And people do tithe. People are
taught to give by faith, to
understand that “God loves a cheerful giver” and that “you can’t out-give God”,
etc. Sometimes the message rests on thread-bare theology, but at least it’s
taught – and taught with enthusiasm and sincerity.
Believe me, there is a huge difference between hearing an
earnest sermon about giving freely of one’s resources to the local church
because of the needs of God’s people, and hearing a lukewarm, monotone explanation
of why we have to fork over some cash for the Bishop’s Appeal (or whatever) by
a pastor who’s afraid the mere mention of giving money to the Church will offend
some people. Giving “from the heart” to a God Whom we love and Who loves us is
just plain different than the sort of institutionalized giving I’ve seen in the
Church.
I’ve tried to convince a priest or two that, if they make a
change that really should be made (e.g., correct a liturgical abuse), they may
lose some “givers”, but they will gain
others. They didn’t believe me, and so they didn’t even try.
But ask yourself: why would God not provide for a parish that is growing in holiness, becoming more
reverent in the liturgy, and striving to minister to the poor?
Nowhere in Scripture is it written that “God helps those who
help themselves.” On the contrary, Proverbs 3:5-6 tells us, “Trust in the Lord
with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding. In all your ways
acknowledge him, and he will direct your path.”
I think it’s time to re-group and take stock of the Church’s
relationship with the government. It’s time to rethink the tax exempt status
that is so near and dear to the hearts of so many of our bishops – so near and dear that it
led one bishop to silence
a priest who preached the truth and banish him to a distant corner of the
diocese.
If the Church’s tax exempt status truly does require a
silencing or twisting of the truth, is it worth it?
Are the souls lost to falsehood and sin worth the dollars
made available for “social justice” projects?
Bishops and priests, is it worth risking your own souls (by
failing to teach and preach the truth to your flock) in order to gain a few
extra dollars?
There has to be a better way. Pray for our bishops.
Mixed bag. If the Church gives up its tax exempt status those who donate to Churches no longer can deduct their donations from their taxes. Might be a disincentive for giving. But we are headed that way anyhow as the current regime would love to do away with charitable giving deductions.
ReplyDelete