Saturday, June 22, 2013

Fr. Andersen Homily: Don't Hold Back from God

Yes, I know this is almost a week late, but it's always good to review the previous Sunday's readings and homily!

A homily by Fr. Eric M. Andersen, Sacred Heart-St. Louis in Gervais, OR

June 16th, 2013
Dominica XI Per Annum, Anno C.

In the first reading today, we encounter King David who is suffering the consequences of grave sin. He repents of his sins, and his sins are forgiven, but the prophet Nathan tells him that the consequences of the sin are that the child of the illicit union will die. King David lusted after another man’s wife. He used his power to seduce her. He treated her like an object. He did not see her in her humanity. He did not treat her as someone with an immortal soul, with an eternal destiny. He saw her with the eyes of selfishness. She was an object whom he could use to obtain what he wanted. He used her selfishly. This action bore bitter fruit.

Now the wife of Uriah was not accustomed to being used. Her husband Uriah was an honorable man. He was a soldier. When King David tried to get him drunk so that he would go home to his wife, Uriah, being an honorable man, did not get drunk and he did not go home. A soldier could not have relations with his wife as long as he was in a period of military service. He must remain chaste and continent. This was out of respect for his office and for his wife. She was accustomed to this honorable treatment from her good husband.

We contrast this with the sinful woman in the Gospel. She is accustomed to being objectified and used by men. But our Lord does not treat her as an object. He sees her as a person, not as a thing. The Pharisees look at her as an object of scorn. They do not look upon her as a person. Jesus sees her as a person with an immortal soul and an eternal destiny. She is not an object, but rather a subject and He treats her as such. She knows this and she trusts Jesus.

This is the difference between lust and love. Lust is about power. Lust uses other people, treating them like objects, in order to get what one wants. Lust is selfish; it takes. Love on the other hand, is generous; it gives. Love looks upon the beloved as an immortal soul destined for eternal life. That is how our Lord looks upon us. We are destined for eternal life.
We are not defined by our sins. The Pharisees defined this woman by her sins. That was all they saw. God does not define us by our sins. He sees us as His beloved sons and daughters.

What we see in the Gospel is a woman with an apparently scandalous past. But all the more does Jesus forgive her sins. And she loves Him all the more because she has been forgiven more. She knows that He can heal her from the effects of sin which have ravaged her. That is why she seeks Him out as she does. She trusts Him because He is pure and not lustful. He gives her true love.

Each of us seeks to be loved. Love is healing to our souls. We seek love through our families, our parents, and siblings, etc. Some people seek out the love of God by means of marriage; others seek out the love of God directly through the consecrated life or the priesthood. The love of God, the love of Jesus, is real love. We know that Jesus will give us Himself and He will treat us with love and respect. We need never worry about being objectified by Him. In His eyes and in His heart, we are subjects and not objects. His is a pure and true love for us.

This woman was converted from her life of sin to a life of purity when she encountered Jesus. She did not go back to her scandalous life after this encounter. How could she? Her heart and soul had been healed by Jesus. She had desperately sought this kind of love before but turned to sinful encounters trying to find it and not finding it at all. Instead she found sorrow and loneliness and scorn from other men.

But from Jesus, she found joy, and love, and peace. How did this happen? She poured out herself to Him. She was extravagant with her gifts to Him. By her extravagance with Jesus, her own heart was healed. She once treated other men in an idolatrous way, seeking from them what only God could give to her. But now she knows that only God can love her enough to fill the emptiness inside of her. We can learn from that.

With Jesus, we cannot be too needy or too extravagant. We can give and give and give to Jesus, and He will love us purely and perfectly in return. And He will not be outdone by us. He will give back to us in ways that we might not even anticipate. And He will never treat any of us as a thing. We will always be a person––a subject––with an immortal soul destined for eternity. Let us not hold anything back from Him. 

Friday, June 21, 2013

Music to Our Ears: Archbishop Sample's Address to the Sacred Music Colloquium

Archbishop Alexander King Sample of the Archdiocese of Portland, Oregon, delivered the plenary address at the Sacred Music Colloquium sponsored by the Church Music Association of America in Salt Lake City, Utah, on June 19, 2013. The audio recording is here. The photos are from the New Liturgical Movement website, go there to see more!

The Chant Café called the address “profoundly encouraging on every level”, and I couldn’t agree more! The Chant Café’s Kathleen Pluth goes on to note:

Throughout Archbishop Sample's talk, I experienced a sense of relief. I realized that in a remarkable way, possible only in our unusual post-conciliar times, the torch has passed from groups like the CMAA. The job of carrying the banner is in some very real sense no longer ours. This responsibility is now being carried by its rightful stewards, the bishops of the Church.

Indeed, Archbishop Sample certainly shows himself to be a true shepherd in this presentation.

The official manuscript is here. It's well worth your time to read it.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Archbishop Sample at the Colloquium

Jeffrey Tucker and Archbishop Sample
at the Colloquium
(photo stolen from Chant Cafe)
UPDATE: See photos at NLM blog. Listen to Archbishop Sample's talk here. See video interview embedded below. My transcription of the talk can be found here.
  ** ** ** **

Archbishop Alexander Sample is at the Sacred Music Colloquium in Salt Lake City. 

I am told he just finished speaking a short time ago.

A text message from someone I know who is attending the Colloquium said, " Schazaaam!!!"

This was followed by almost immediately by a subsequent message which said:

"Just came from Abp Sample's talk on the Sacred Liturgy. Good thing you weren't here."

Well... Of course, I inquired, "Why?"

The message came back:

"It was held in the Cathedral. I was in tears. Msgr Wadsworth told him that people like him had waited a lifetime to hear those word.

"It would have been all I could do to keep you from jumping up on the pews, shouting 'AMEN, BROTHER, PREACH IT!!!!'"

Perhaps that says more about me than it does about Archbishop Sample's talk, but it's all I've go for now!

I'm sure we'll hear more soon.

UPDATE: Here's an interview from Chant Cafe:

Calling Out the Catholic Media: CMTV Special Report


Update: Check out this blog - another good commentary on this issue.

Here’s another very hard-hitting special report from ChurchMilitant.TV, following up on the special report on the “gay Vatican” from the other day.

Really, you should watch the whole video, embedded below. Here’s an excerpt from the script to whet your appetite. Michael Voris calls out the Catholic media.

See, it’s actually very simple. When you tune in to big name Catholic TV outlets or radio shows with big name professional Catholics, or go to official church sponsored men’s conferences or women’s conferences with the usual Catholic speaking tour names on the marquee, you hear all kinds of great things and solid talks about the teachings of the Church; but you won’t hear a word breathed about the real problems.

That’s because if they open their mouths about these other problems, they will be disinvited, their books won’t be published, their articles will be pulled from official Catholic papers and they will be off the air faster than a bull of excommunication could be promulgated.

In short, they won’t tell you the truth because they are too cowardly to pay the personal financial cost.

So they blather on about how rotten Obama is and the Culture of Death ad infinitum. They will say things about Joe Biden or Nancy Pelosi – things that are true by the way – but they will never finish the thought; they will never say, “WHY ARE these people allowed to continue on as though they are Catholics in good standing?”.

Every serious Catholic already knows Obama is evil, the Culture of Death is winning, the homosexual agenda is on the march everywhere. We already know that –stop telling us. Talk about WHY.  Talk about HOW.

See, what they don’t tell you is HOW and WHY of Obama getting elected: a majority of Catholics voted for him. The WHY and HOW those conditions came to be in the Church where a majority of Catholics happily go and vote for this agent of evil and all his henchmen.

What are the conditions in the Church that have CAUSED this to be the case? This, they will NEVER BREATH A WORD ABOUT because they are hypocrites. They KNOW beyond a doubt that there is massive failing of faith on the part of leaders in the Church, but they won’t touch THAT topic with a ten foot pole. They will happily hide behind such lofty and noble sounding defenses like, “we don’t want to cause division and talking about these things brings about division”.

RIDICULOUS.

The division is already there, in spades. Over half of the nearly 70 million baptized Catholics in America have divided themselves from the Church. To talk about that isn’t CAUSING division; it’s trying to understand it so it can be solved.

But the Catholic media types take their cues from many of the bishops who drank the Koolaid decades ago when they were seminarians or baby priests of a vision of the Church where we are all nice and friendly and never say anything  challenging or offensive. Keep the machine grinding along. Collect millions of dollars. And never say anything offensive.

These Catholic media personalities and the people behind them know there has been a massive infiltration of homosexual activists in the Church and chanceries and episcopate. And they deliberately say nothing to you because they don’t want to fall out of favor with bishops and cardinals which translates into a loss of income for them.

And more than that, they go after reliable Catholics who tell you the whole truth, because these reliable sources of information know that the only way to change evil is to expose it.

See the full script here.

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Yes, They Did: St. Andrew's In Portland Gay Pride Parade

They said they would, and I doubt anyone is surprised they did.  

The above photo is from the OregonLive website. The caption OregonLive supplied says:
PORTLAND, OREGON - June 16, 2013 - Parishioners from St. Andrew's Catholic Church march in the 2013 Portland Pride Parade in Portland on Sunday. The Archbishop Alexander K. Sample discouraged parishioners from marching with signs bearing the parish's name, but the group stood by their 17-year commitment to Portland's gay community. Molly J. Smith/The Oregonian 
 Of course, in typical double-speak, the dissenters said that they weren't really being disobedient in their disobedience. They were "following their conscience" - which appears to be malformed. 

I think many of the faithful will be watching to see what the consequences will be. Please pray for Archbishop Sample, that he will be holy and heroic in his defense of the faith.

See also "The Battle Begins In Portland".

A commenter suggested that I write a letter of support to the Archbishop. Good idea! And anyone else can do the same. The address of the archdiocese is:

Archdiocese of Portland
2838 East Burnside St.
Portland, OR 97214-1895

The email address given as their contact address is bbunce@archdpdx.org  (Bud Bunce is the Director of Communications for the Archdiocese)

Here's the archdiocesan website: http://www.archdpdx.org

This announcement appears on the archdiocesan home page:
While on the pilgrimage to the Vatican to receive the pallium, Archbishop Sample will keep in touch with Catholics of the Archdiocese of Portland via social media - Twitter and Facebook - beginning June 23 
https://twitter.com/@ArchbishpSample
https://www.facebook.com/bishopalexandersample?fref=ts

Another Voice on "Heroic Parenthood"

A reader sent me a link to an article in Christian Order magazine, and I’ve seen it in various places since then – it was featured on Tantamergo’s blog, and also on Rorate Caeli blog.

The article, “Heroic Parenthood”, by Christopher Gawley, is an excellent summary of the issues surrounding NFP. The amazing thing, to me, is that Mr. Gawley’s article is essentially a concise and eloquent summary of my book, Natural Family Planning: Trojan Horse in the Catholic Bedroom?  - but he wrote the article without any awareness of what I have said on the topic (which I maintain is what the Church has said). I think the Holy Spirit enlightened each of us independently, along with others like John Galvin, Fr. William Gardner, Carey Winters, Randy Engel, and Michael Malone, who have also written on the topic, and who helped me to think about it.

 Mr. Gawley has stated the concepts in a way that is fresh and inspirational to me, so I am going to present some excerpts from the article here, with a few comments interspersed. It was difficult not to just copy-and-paste the entire article – it’s that good! - but you can read it for yourself in its entirety here. For the moment, I want to give you a taste to whet your appetite, and also highlight some of the outstanding points Mr. Gawley makes.

The article is divided into four major sections, and I will arrange the excerpts and my comments accordingly.

The Problem Stated: An Ever-growing Contraceptive Anti-Culture

Mr. Gawley makes clear from the beginning what he sees as the source of the problems in the Church today. “Of all of the symptoms that demonstrate the disease in the Church, none does so more meaningfully than the decline of the Catholic family (and all families by extension)…” He notes that

The reduction in the Catholic family — indeed, all families — is undoubtedly due to rapid advance of artificial contraception. Taken together, "legalized" abortion and artificial contraception have formed a one-two punch to drive down family sizes much to the joy of modern-day Malthusians.

The Proposed Solution: Responsible Parenthood and Natural Family Planning

The NFP community – and now the US bishops – have promoted NFP as the solution to the unfortunate Catholic propensity to run counter to Church teaching by using artificial contraception.  Gawley asserts that

The history of NFP cannot be divorced from artificial contraception. In the context of condemning birth control, Holy  Mother Church has taught that NFP, as a dispensation from the normal relations between husband and wife, can be morally acceptable…

He quotes from Pope Pius XII’s Allocution to Midwives regarding the need for serious motives to avoid pregnancy while still engaging in the marital embrace. He also notes that, regarding Humanae Vitae,

… what essentially began as qualified dispensation from normal marital relations and obligations has morphed in recent years into something very different in the minds of the Church leaders.  A negative – that is, a permission to deviate from the norm for grave reasons, has been transformed into a positive.

Mr. Gawley goes on to examine the stance of the US bishops, who seem to have made NFP “a de facto teaching as the way in which married couples ought to relate to one another — a holy good in and of itself… “.  

There can be no question that NFP has eclipsed — at least from official diocesan sources — any other way that marriage and fecundity should be understood. …NFP is styled in almost mystic terms as one of the greatest revelations regarding married life in the history of the Church. What you are more likely to hear at a real-world Catholic marriage preparation class is the following on the question of children – usually by a mature Catholic co-teaching married couple with a few children:

Catholicism does not require that you become parents of a large family – rather it wants you to be responsible parents. NFP offers you a reasonable alternative to artificial contraception: a way for you young couples to be responsible while not availing yourselves to drugs or devices that degrade your humanity. You should use these NFP techniques to grow closer, to communicate better, and prayerfully consider whether and when you should bring children into the world in a responsible manner. If that
means that you need to delay — even permanently — having children, that is acceptable today with the use of NFP. And what's more, NFP is proven to be 99% effective for avoiding pregnancy — just as effective as the pill.

Yes, always we are reminded that NFP is as effective as the Pill…not that anyone has a “contraceptive mentality” where NFP is concerned...

Why Natural Family Planning Has Failed

And regarding the argument that NFP cannot possibly be used with a “contraceptive mentality”, Mr. Gawley says:

I thought hard about it but realized at the end that this argument was sophistry. What critics of NFP zealotry mean by "contraceptive mentality" is that people – many people – use NFP as the practical substitute for contraception to avoid children altogether while still enjoying the sensual pleasures of marital relations. Truly it is a form of conjugal bulimia. While NFP brings you to a place without children in a markedly different manner, it nonetheless still brings you there.

Mr. Gawly talks also about the failure to consider the necessary moral grounds for using NFP – i.e, “serious” or “grave” reasons. He follows it up with this important consequence:

A corollary principle that follows from ignoring the moral requirements of availing oneself to NFP is that our rightly ordered disposition towards it – and childbearing – has been inverted. Because NFP advocates treat NFP as a good without qualification, couples are encouraged to view using NFP as a positive part of their conjugal lives. But Catholic couples ought to feel a sorrow by having the necessity to resort to NFP. By analogy, NFP is a type of bankruptcy in a technical sense. Bankruptcy is also a legal dispensation – from our lawful debts. Bankruptcy also should be used for serious and grave reasons. While we should not judge the bankrupt or cloak him in shame, we should not celebrate him or the dispensation either. NFP is similar: for grave and serious reasons, we cannot fulfill our obligations to be totally open to children (for a time or permanently) – we should not celebrate this as a good thing but rather endure it.

I particularly like his argument about bankruptcy and “dispensation from our lawful debts”; it meshes nicely with the comments in the sermon I transcribed here, which also mentioned the “marriage debt”.

And then there’s the modesty issue:

Another problem with NFP in practice is its vulgarity: its pedestrian treatment of something intimate, something exalted, something requiring modesty tends to desacralize marital relations. Must engaged Catholic couples be subjected – in a room full of others – to the science of charting the appearance of cervical mucus and vaginal discharge? Must they discuss what one hopes is their future sexual life in the midst of strangers? … Count me as one of the few, I suppose, who does not believe that the assiduous monitoring of my wife's menstrual cycle – and discussing it in mixed company – will make me a better communicator or husband… If I sound prudish, perhaps I am, but others have seen in this type of forced public discussion of sex and the science behind it as the risk of vulgarizing the holy.

The Solution Stated: Heroic Parenthood and the Cult of Embracing Large Families

I’ll let Mr. Gawley take it from here:

Simply stated, the idea of "responsible parenthood" sells the faith short and is pregnant (pardon the pun) with concepts that are inconsistent with Catholic heroism. We should not settle for "responsible parenthood" but aspire for "heroic parenthood." Our Lord did not come so that we may have a dispensation or a life centered around infertility; he came for us to have an abundant life
.
…More than any other visible social institution, large Catholic families contradict all of the ill-conceived assumptions of modernity. They are, as it were, a collective middle finger to an anti-culture that would tell us that God is dead, that man and life are worthless, and that it would be better if we were never born. The shining radiance and exuberance of large families is a living, breathing rejoinder to the dour and childless chorus. But large families are more than a counter-cultural expression, they epitomize Catholicism in practice because the parents are blessed by living out their married vocation in the fullest sense. God's blessing of children and fecundity itself seems to be a forgotten part of this debate

…. We have an answer to those who would maintain that life should be little more than a titillated distraction before rotting into nothingness: they are a death people that want to organize society around preventing babies, killing babies, killing disabled people, and killing old people. Their world is a more than a social malaise: it is gripped by despair and thirsting for living waters. We have to offer the living waters of the Gospel; we are a life people and nothing communicates our trust in God, our love of life, our belief in each other than our unconditional embrace of children. The world will be re-converted by such families.

Mr. Gawley ends with this Postscript:

While it would be virtually unthinkable that a diocesan marriage preparation program might say something as follows, we can still dream:

For you young Catholic people who are marrying in your twenties, you can expect, God willing and absent a physical impairment or grave reason, to have a home filled with many children. You should mentally, physically and spiritually prepare for seven, eight, nine or more children given your ages. You should be prepared to accept the hardships that come with having a large family for two important reasons; children please our Lord and your cooperation with the Lord in bringing forth new souls will in turn please our God, which will bring you many graces. Second, having a large family will help you be saved, it will re-focus your attention from the material attachments that are both rampant today and hazardous to your eternal destination. Your many children will help you to become better and holier people and will stand as a contradiction to a world that has forgot how to live the abundant life. You, and your large faithful families, will turn the tide against the scoffers and misanthropes who would revile God's creation and man's place in it. We cannot promise you it will be easy because it won't, but if you persevere in prayer and virtue, you will overcome with God's grace. And should you live to see your children's children, you will praise God all the more that he saw fit to give you the gift of faith.

Have life and have it abundantly — have children.