A
reader sent me a link
to an article in Christian Order magazine, and I’ve
seen it in various places since then – it was featured on Tantamergo’s
blog, and also on Rorate
Caeli blog.

Mr. Gawley has stated the concepts in a way
that is fresh and inspirational to me, so I am going to present some excerpts
from the article here, with a few comments interspersed. It was difficult not
to just copy-and-paste the entire article – it’s that good! - but you can read
it for yourself in its entirety here.
For the moment, I want to give you a taste to whet your appetite, and also
highlight some of the outstanding points Mr. Gawley makes.
The
article is divided into four major sections, and I will arrange the excerpts
and my comments accordingly.



Mr.
Gawley makes clear from the beginning what he sees as the source of the
problems in the Church today. “Of all of the symptoms that demonstrate the
disease in the Church, none does so more meaningfully than the decline of the
Catholic family (and all families by extension)…” He notes that
The reduction in the Catholic
family — indeed, all families — is undoubtedly due to rapid advance of
artificial contraception. Taken together, "legalized" abortion and
artificial contraception have formed a one-two punch to drive down family sizes
much to the joy of modern-day Malthusians.
The Proposed Solution: Responsible Parenthood and Natural Family Planning
The NFP
community – and now the US bishops – have promoted NFP as the solution to the
unfortunate Catholic propensity to run counter to Church teaching by using
artificial contraception. Gawley asserts
that
He
quotes from Pope Pius XII’s Allocution to
Midwives regarding the need for serious motives to avoid pregnancy while
still engaging in the marital embrace. He also notes that, regarding Humanae Vitae,
… what essentially began as
qualified dispensation from normal marital relations and obligations has
morphed in recent years into something very different in the minds of the Church
leaders. A negative – that is, a
permission to deviate from the norm for grave reasons, has been transformed
into a positive.
Mr.
Gawley goes on to examine the stance of the US bishops, who seem to have made
NFP “a de facto teaching as the way in which married couples ought to relate to
one another — a holy good in and of itself… “.
There can be no question that
NFP has eclipsed — at least from official diocesan sources — any other way that
marriage and fecundity should be understood. …NFP is styled in almost mystic
terms as one of the greatest revelations regarding married life in the history
of the Church. What you are more likely to hear at a real-world Catholic
marriage preparation class is the following on the question of children – usually
by a mature Catholic co-teaching married couple with a few children:
Catholicism does not require
that you become parents of a large family – rather it wants you to be
responsible parents. NFP offers you a reasonable alternative to artificial
contraception: a way for you young couples to be responsible while not availing
yourselves to drugs or devices that degrade your humanity. You should use these
NFP techniques to grow closer, to communicate better, and prayerfully consider
whether and when you should bring children into the world in a responsible
manner. If that
means that you need to delay —
even permanently — having children, that is acceptable today with the use of
NFP. And what's more, NFP is proven to be 99% effective for avoiding pregnancy —
just as effective as the pill.
Yes,
always we are reminded that NFP is as effective as the Pill…not that anyone has
a “contraceptive mentality” where NFP is concerned...
Why Natural Family Planning Has Failed
And
regarding the argument that NFP cannot possibly be used with a “contraceptive
mentality”, Mr. Gawley says:
I thought hard about it but
realized at the end that this argument was sophistry. What critics of NFP
zealotry mean by "contraceptive mentality" is that people – many
people – use NFP as the practical substitute for contraception to avoid children
altogether while still enjoying the sensual pleasures of marital relations.
Truly it is a form of conjugal bulimia. While NFP brings you to a place without
children in a markedly different manner, it nonetheless still brings you there.
Mr.
Gawly talks also about the failure to consider the necessary moral grounds for
using NFP – i.e, “serious” or “grave” reasons. He follows it up with this
important consequence:
A corollary principle that
follows from ignoring the moral requirements of availing oneself to NFP is that
our rightly ordered disposition towards it – and childbearing – has been
inverted. Because NFP advocates treat NFP as a good without qualification, couples
are encouraged to view using NFP as a positive part of their conjugal lives.
But Catholic couples ought to feel a sorrow by having the necessity to resort
to NFP. By analogy, NFP is a type of bankruptcy in a technical sense.
Bankruptcy is also a legal dispensation – from our lawful debts. Bankruptcy
also should be used for serious and grave reasons. While we should not judge
the bankrupt or cloak him in shame, we should not celebrate him or the
dispensation either. NFP is similar: for grave and serious reasons, we cannot
fulfill our obligations to be totally open to children (for a time or
permanently) – we should not celebrate this as a good thing but rather endure
it.
I
particularly like his argument about bankruptcy and “dispensation from our
lawful debts”; it meshes nicely with the comments in the sermon I transcribed here,
which also mentioned the “marriage debt”.
And
then there’s the modesty issue:
The Solution Stated: Heroic Parenthood and the Cult of Embracing Large Families
I’ll
let Mr. Gawley take it from here:
Simply stated, the idea of
"responsible parenthood" sells the faith short and is pregnant
(pardon the pun) with concepts that are inconsistent with Catholic heroism. We
should not settle for "responsible parenthood" but aspire for
"heroic parenthood." Our Lord did not come so that we may have a
dispensation or a life centered around infertility; he came for us to have an abundant
life
.
…More than any other visible
social institution, large Catholic families contradict all of the ill-conceived
assumptions of modernity. They are, as it were, a collective middle finger to
an anti-culture that would tell us that God is dead, that man and life are
worthless, and that it would be better if we were never born. The shining
radiance and exuberance of large families is a living, breathing rejoinder to
the dour and childless chorus. But large families are more than a
counter-cultural expression, they epitomize Catholicism in practice because the
parents are blessed by living out their married vocation in the fullest sense.
God's blessing of children and fecundity itself seems to be a forgotten part of
this debate
…. We have an answer to those
who would maintain that life should be little more than a titillated
distraction before rotting into nothingness: they are a death people that want
to organize society around preventing babies, killing babies, killing disabled
people, and killing old people. Their world is a more than a social malaise: it
is gripped by despair and thirsting for living waters. We have to offer the
living waters of the Gospel; we are a life people and nothing communicates our
trust in God, our love of life, our belief in each other than our unconditional
embrace of children. The world will be re-converted by such families.
Mr.
Gawley ends with this Postscript:
While it would be virtually
unthinkable that a diocesan marriage preparation program might say something as
follows, we can still dream:
Have life and have it
abundantly — have children.