A week or so ago, on LifeSiteNews, there was an article by
Jill Stanek entitled “Beyond
Creepy: Obama Uses Daughters to Push Abortion”. She mentions Obama’s 2008
promotion of comprehensive sex education, where he said:
I’ve got two daughters, 9 years
old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and
morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I
don’t want them punished with an STD at the age of 16.
I certainly agree that it’s “creepy” (like a lot of things
about Obama), but here’s the statement that caught my attention. Jill Stanek
commented:
It is just weird for Obama to
discuss his daughters’ future sex lives, period.
I agree with her completely on that point, as well.
But it made me think about something completely different:
NFP, and the promoters thereof, who think NFP should be taught not just to
couples in pre-marriage classes, but to high school students as well.
Isn’t it a little creepy for NFP promoters to be talking
about these young people’s future sex lives?!
Oh, I know. It’s not all about sex; it’s about their health. It will help the girls to better
understand their bodies, to become better able to predict their physical and
emotional cycles; and boys can learn how to better understand girls’ hormonal
and mood fluctuations. Sure, I get that, and there can definitely be some
benefits to it…I guess…
But let me play “here’s my story” for a minute: gaining
knowledge about my body and my fertility cycle when I was in high school would
have been put to the service of pre-marital sex. Learning NFP may have served
to slightly allay my fears of getting
pregnant out of wedlock. But it would not have prevented me from using birth
control pills, because I would have been scared to death that I’d make a
mistake in the charting, or misread my temperature, or some such thing. I would
still have seen the Pill as more reliable than NFP. So I would still have used
the Pill while I engaged in pre-marital sex with my boyfriend.
Now, I do understand that the good Catholic
folks promoting NFP for teens are not suggesting that these young
people should, could, or would be engaging in premarital sex. Not at all. I
know they have good intentions.
But I am
suggesting that society already has kids thinking about sex,
sex, sex, sex way more than is healthy, and teaching Catholic
teens NFP in high school just compounds the problem by implying that the Church
also wants them to focus on the sexual aspect of their relationships.
Not only that, but teaching
them NFP in conjunction with teaching the Church’s prohibition of artificial
contraception simply condones and encourages the contraceptive mentality that
runs rampant in our culture today (and this is fatal flaw in SheIsCatholic’s
NFP video). And if you don’t like the
word “contraceptive”, just substitute “birth control”. The outcome is the same:
fewer children; fewer Catholics; fewer vocations.
And now, a limerick:
There are those who think NFP
Is God’s plan for their family.
Mucus and charts
All play a part
In managing fertility.
NFP takes the place of the Pill
When families just can’t pay the bill
For more mouths to feed
And more kids who need
A life that’s not “run of the mill”.
Let’s see if I’ve got this straight:
Be prudent - both you and your mate!
Responsible parents
Must sometimes be barren
And tell God to NOT procreate.
For more NFP posts on this blog, click on the "NFP Posts" tab at the top of the page.