First, a word of self-defense: I do try to find good things to say on my blog. I have written about bishops with backbone and persevering priests
who truly defend the faith, and who truly shepherd the faithful; and I've even found some hopeful stories about the Traditional Latin Mass being re-introduced in various places around the country, even if my diocese isn't one of them...yet.
But, second, let me just shrug my shoulders and
say, “So..?” It happens that there’s a lot wrong with the Church these days - not with the Church Herself, and her teachings, of course, but with the implementation of those teachings - and I’m not the only one voicing that opinion or giving examples of the
shortcomings. And it’s not just me ‘n’ MV, either – there are plenty of
others. There have been plenty of others for decades now. In fact,
there have probably been people being accused of being “negative” and “critical”
since the beginning. After all, the Church is comprised of human beings, each
of whom has a fallen human nature. The Church is full of sinners.
In the last 50 years, though, the problems seems to have
been exacerbated by some unidentified (ha!) force. There was Vatican II, and
then there was the steep decline of the Catholic Church. Well, correlation, as
they say, does not imply causation; there were lots of sociological and political factors at work at
the same time, including the “sexual revolution”, and Protestant groups
acquiescing to artificial contraception, among other issues. Still, there does seem
to be some evidence that Vatican II didn’t really help matters any. There are dozens of litanies out there about the
ways in which the Church – especially in the West – has declined, and I’m not
going to recite them here. You readers know what I’m talking about – even you “liberal”
readers who lurk around the corners of this blog, waiting to jump on me for
being “critical”.
Anyway, the point is that the Church is in trouble. The Church –
certainly the Church in the United States – is divided. That division hasn’t come about simply because a handful of
people in a particular parish or diocese have clamored for the traditional
Latin Mass, either - despite the fact that traditionalists are often accused of being "divisive". The division doesn’t really have much to do with the TLM,
at least not currently, and not directly. Rather, it has to do with the
political views of the Catholic population of this country and the way “liberal-progressive-modernist”
Catholics have sought to redefine important concepts like “conscience” and “social
justice” in alignment with their political views. The division is about the truth of the teachings of the Church,
which and how many of those teachings can be changed in order to bring the
Church into the modern age.
As I have said, there are plenty of people talking about all
that’s wrong with the Church today. But ask yourself: is anything being done to
change the downward trends in vocations, Mass attendance, frequency of
confession (if ever!), etc.? No. Duh. In fact, as Michael Voris has pointed out
numerous times, the “establishment Church” doesn’t want to hear about it. The “establishment
Church” will acknowledge some problems, some of the time, but gloss over them
and tell everyone to hurry to the next LA Religious Ed Conference to get their
annual fix of liturgical dance and youth-oriented Kathlic teaching. Put on a happy face.
Right.
While I am happy to give credit where credit is due, and
applaud bishops who are taking courageous steps to reverse the trends and once
again build up the Church, the fact is, there are not many of these. Thirteen
years ago, Rod Pead, editor of Christian
Order, said at a conference (see this post):
A prelate stands up to condemn
sodomy or abortion – the minimum one might expect of a Catholic bishop – and we
go weak at the knees and lose all sense of proportion in our rush to
congratulate him. In our desperation for something – for someone – to hold on
to, we blithely ignore the standards set by St. Paul, who wrote to Titus that “a
bishop must be beyond reproach, since he is the steward of God's house…”, and
that the bishop is duty bound to “rebuke sharply” the “many disobedient, vain
talkers and seducers” who “bring ruin on entire households by false teaching”;
false teachers who, St. Paul concludes: “must be silenced.” [Titus 1:7-13].
Rod Pead was speaking in 2000. Thirteen years later, we’re
still in the same boat. We’re still praising the bishops who say
something that is the minimum we
would expect a shepherd of the Church to say. When I am critical of bishops and
priests for going decades without really impressing on the faithful the
immorality of artificial contraception, I hear, “But at least they’re doing something
now!” Yeah. Right. They are standing up for our first amendment rights, our
freedom of religion; but have they taken a poll lately to see how many “Catholics”
believe the Church teaching on contraception (or abortion or “gay marriage”)?
If they haven’t, they'll have no problem locating someone who has, and
the statistics are far from encouraging.
To me, that says we don’t need fewer of those who raise their voices in protest against what is
going on in the Church today; we need more. We need to raise the roof until our shepherds run the wolves out of the flocks and start preaching and teaching the absolute Truth of the Catholic faith.
Just replace the politicians with some Church leaders... |
Yes, you would. So would I.
And that is why I write what I write on this blog. I want to
help save the House. I came to the Church all too late in life, but I love Her.
I loved Her before I knew that the house was on fire! Now that I know, well, I’m
trying to make up for lost time.